Q&A: Why do Republicans wait until a Democrat is in office to complain about over spending?
Question by Jasmine: Why do Republicans wait until a Democrat is in office to complain about over spending?
A 12 year green light for Reagan and H.W. then an 8 year green light for W.
They screamed stop spending to both Clinton and Obama.
Best answer:
Answer by Diethyl Ether Dinner Candle
Current Projections
If the election were held today
Senate 2010
+ 8 GOP
More Senate race analysis
House 2010
+ 55 GOP
More House race analysis
Governor 2010
+ 8-9 GOP
Know better? Leave your own answer in the comments!
| Print article | This entry was posted by environmental4u on January 18, 2013 at 3:49 AM, and is filed under Green Business. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about 4 months ago
because they is bad
about 4 months ago
Our deficit was at $ 300-400 billion a year the first 6 years of Bush and a republican majority. 4 years under pelosi and democrats, and they have racked up $ 5 trillion in debt.
Nice try, you fail.
about 4 months ago
It’s the way it goes, the party out of power complains, complains, complains, even though they are complaining about many of the same things they did themselves. And sadly, most Americans attention spans seem to be too short to notice this.
about 4 months ago
It was the DEM that were in control since 2006 only weak Bush wouldn’t Veto there bills. And Pushed Amnesty.So we don’t want that mistake again.Vote them all out and get 1s that are for the USA and the production of new company’s. Not spending.
about 4 months ago
The Tea Party was ignited under Bush (in 2007) for this reason.
And it was contrived by libertarian conservatives; ones who haven’t been associated with the Neocon Republican Party for many years.
If you believe the conservative base approved Bush’s unprecedented spending, you are mistaken.
about 4 months ago
I know. I’dthought they learned we wnat less spending
about 4 months ago
Republican lawmakers prefer the money to go directly in their pockets and the pockets of their cronies. They don’t appear to care about tax cuts for the middle class. They get rich on the back of American citizens who elect them into office for this purpose! Curious, since Bush did not plan on extending the tax cuts for the wealthy! He was pressured into it by Dick Cheney and Karl Rove.
The war in Iraq was planned before President Cheney/Rove/Rumsfeld/Bush was elected! Curious.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=inyCkCvqRO0
The war in Iraq, that plunged American taxpayers into debt, was a money maker for cronies of the Cheney/Rove/Rumsfeld/Bush Administration. These are the people/businesses (hallibirton) who benefited from the war in Iraq………
http://newsflavor.com/politics/world-politics/the-people-who-benefited-from-the-iraq-war/
Its all by design. They begrudge the middle class a tax break. They are the people who pay their salaries! They begrudge poor people food and shelter and they can’t wait to get their tax cuts. Pathetic!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o2Pg5NGkHVI&p=42FCF9C5AF4B94FF&playnext=1&index=19
about 4 months ago
Oh, that’s easy. Because when a Republican is in office the Democrats get to do the complaining, and the smearing and the belittling, and the insults and the mocking no? Besides, no radical party should have absolute power! That makes a democracy work, doesn’t it. Easy 2 points here!